Pan-Iranist Progressive Demands Clarity of Intention Regarding PARS.ORG and the Integrity of Iran’s Retirement Tradition
The Pan-Iranist Progressive movement calls for immediate transparency and clarification regarding the use and representation of the domain name PARS.ORG, which it views as a misleading abbreviation that undermines the historical and cultural significance of the term PARS. This concern is not merely semantic—it touches on the deeper issue of how digital and institutional symbols are being repurposed in ways that distort Iran’s civilizational legacy.
Retirement Tradition as a Pillar of Iranian Royal Law
The misuse of PARS in digital domains like PARS.ORG is seen as a direct affront to Iran’s ancient retirement tradition—a royal support law rooted in the “wise timeline” of governance. This tradition, which ensured dignity and security for elders and public servants, was a hallmark of Persian administrative ethics. It reflects a continuity of care and respect that transcends dynastic shifts and religious transitions. To trivialize this legacy through vague or commercialized digital branding is to erode the foundations of Iranian social heritage.
Water-Centric Framework and the DVUMPP Vision
In parallel, the Pan-Iranist Progressive movement emphasizes the urgent need for a geo-technical water-centric framework to guide the transformation of governance under the principles of Woman, Life, Freedom. This framework is not merely environmental—it is civilizational. It is anchored in the Darius Vital Ultra Mega Power Program (DVUMPP), a strategic initiative inspired by the infrastructural foresight of Darius the Great. DVUMPP envisions a comprehensive orientation for managing water resources, urban planning, and cultural sustainability across the Iranian plateau.
This program is further extended by the Sassan Ultra Mega Power Program (SUMPP), which provides the reliance powers necessary to accelerate Persian business R&D, insurance innovation, and the development of a holistic Intellectual Property ecosystem under the true meaning of PARS. These initiatives are not abstract—they are designed to restore Iran’s rightful place as a center of ethical governance, technical excellence, and cultural pluralism.
The Need for Technical Clarity and Constitutional Integration
The Pan-Iranist Progressive movement acknowledges the complexity of implementing such a framework. Yet it insists that this challenge is well within the scope of its technical style and the transformative ethos of Pan-Iranist political party. The party should publish a detailed article on offering technical advice and strategic direction for how the new government can integrate these programs into a pluralistic and forward-looking constitutional model.
Conclusion
The demand for clarity regarding PARS.ORG is not a minor branding dispute—it is a call to defend the integrity of Iranian heritage against dilution and misrepresentation. The Pan-Iranist Progressive movement urges the new government to recognize the symbolic weight of PARS, to honor the retirement tradition as a cornerstone of Persian civil ethics, and to embrace the DVUMPP and SUMPP frameworks as vehicles for national renewal. Only through such clarity of intention can Iran move toward a governance model that is both historically grounded and globally respected.