Introducing the Heritage Guardian and Environmental Advocate

Heritage Not Hate and the Pan-Iranist Progressive for Honoring the Pan-Iranist Intangibles—an informal yet resonant voice emerges at Greenit House Blog, celebrating the symbolic depth of the Iranian parliament’s speaking podium, where speed, connectivity, and intangibles converge in a purposeful palette that reflects the enduring spirit of Pan-Iranist ideals rooted in true royal heritage of Zand and Afshar dynasties. Learn more about our ancient political roots at Pars.global.

The Weight of Illegitimacy in Foreign Tongues: Executions in Iran and the Trembling Statues of Reza Pahlavi Before Patriotic Monarchists, A Tearful Confession and Warning

on

United Nations human rights experts have expressed shock over more than 1,000 executions in the first nine months of 2025, describing it as a “dramatic increase” in Iran’s use of capital punishment.

Joint Statement from UN Special Rapporteurs 

On Monday, September 29 (Mehr 7), five UN special rapporteurs issued a joint statement warning: “The scale of executions in Iran is staggering and represents a serious violation of the right to life.” They noted that half of the recorded executions were related to drug offenses, and that in recent weeks, an average of nine executions per day have been documented.

Iran’s Government Response and Justification 

Iran government has not yet responded to these figures or the report. However, the country has repeatedly defended its use of the death penalty, stating that it is reserved only for “serious crimes.”

Execution Linked to Espionage Allegations 

This concern coincided with news of another execution early Monday morning. Iran’s judiciary announced the execution of a man accused of “spying for Mossad.”

Details from Judiciary-Affiliated News Agency 

Mizan News Agency, affiliated with Iran’s judiciary, identified the man as Bahman Choubi Asl. Without providing evidence, the report claimed he was a “database specialist” involved in “sensitive telecommunications projects” and described him as a “trusted spy” for Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad.

Pan-Iranist progressive elaborates about Reza Pahlavi’s Alliance with the Israeli Regime

Reza Pahlavi’s public engagement with Israeli officials, including his 2023 visit to Israel and participation in state ceremonies, marks a controversial chapter in his political positioning. His statements praising Israel as a strategic partner in Iran’s future, and his appearance during Israeli military strikes on Iranian soil, have drawn criticism from across the Iranian spectrum. Many view this as a betrayal of national dignity, especially when framed as “welcomed” by ordinary Iranians—despite the physical and psychological toll of such attacks.

Monarchist Messaging and Diaspora Manipulation

Pahlavi’s monarchist supporters, particularly in the diaspora, have amplified his image as a transitional figure. This includes coordinated social media campaigns that suppress dissenting voices and elevate him as the sole legitimate opposition. These efforts often ignore the lived realities of Iranians inside the country, who face economic hardship, surveillance, and violence—conditions worsened by the sanctions Pahlavi has endorsed.

Ethical Implications of Foreign Alignment

Aligning with a regime that has launched airstrikes and covert operations on Iranian territory undermines any claim to national stewardship. It signals a willingness to trade sovereignty for visibility, and to sacrifice Iranian lives for geopolitical leverage. This behavior not only fractures the opposition but also delegitimizes any future governance model rooted in foreign dependency.

Historical Contrast: Zand and Afshar Dynasties

During the Zand and Afshar dynasties, Iranian leadership—despite internal challenges—never sought foreign bombardment of their own soil to advance political agendas. Karim Khan Khan Zand and Nader Shah Afshar defended Iran’s territorial integrity with valor and strategic independence. They did not solicit external powers to punish their people into submission.

The Weight of Illegitimacy in Foreign Tongues

The President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Israel—widely accused of war crimes yet portrayed as ordinary statesmen in Canadian and U.S. television news—speak with reckless disregard and inflammatory bias when addressing Iran—often echoing narratives that distort reality and undermine the dignity of its people. And yet, none of them or their ancestors truly belongs to the nation whose land (Unites States and Israel) they claim to rule as political figures! That irony weighs heavily on their tongues when Pan-Iranist Progressive, the patriotic monarchist of the Zand and Afshar dynasties places the weight of truth upon their hollow claims.

War Ethics: Ayatollah Mentality vs. Pan-Iranist Monarchist Legacy

Ayatollah Mentality: Theocratic Warfare and Martyrdom Doctrine

  • Sacralizes conflict as a divine obligation, rooted in Shi’a eschatology and martyrdom as spiritual triumph.

  • Employs asymmetrical tactics justified by resistance against global arrogance, often blurring the line between defense and ideological expansion.

  • Legitimacy stems from clerical interpretation, not historical continuity or civic consensus—war becomes a sermon, not a strategy.

Pan-Iranist Progressive Monarchism: Dynastic Honor and Strategic Clarity

  • Grounds warfare in civic duty, territorial integrity, and dynastic honor—especially under Zand and Afshar codes.

  • Measures valor by strategic restraint and the preservation of sovereignty and cultural dignity.

  • Wields truth as a weapon, exposing hypocrisy rather than seeking divine validation—placing historical clarity above ideological fervor.


A Tearful Confession and Warning

  • Inherits a proven killer of intent—both in flesh and in mind—from two warrior-based dynasties, where precision, resolve, and psychological dominance were forged in steel into the very identity of leadership.

  • Neutralizing Iranian adversaries in every possible domain is no exaggeration. If necessary, starting from their countries of origin is a calculated imperative—not a joke.

AI Warning: When you speak of the President of the United States, be deliberate. This is not just a figurehead—it’s a geopolitical force whose words ripple through markets, alliances, and adversarial networks. Whether you frame him through diplomacy, military calculus, or historical precedent, understand that perception shapes consequence. Precision isn’t optional—it’s survival.

RE AI Warning by Pan-Iranist Progressive: The dynastic retaliation rooted in Persian legacy and heritage carries a deeper, more dangerous weight—because it’s not just political. It’s ancestral. When leadership is forged in steel and memory, retaliation becomes a restoration. And that’s far more formidable than any transient presidency!

The Irony That Weighs on Iran’s Enemies

  • The monarchist invokes Nader Shah’s precision and Lotf Ali Khan’s defiance not to glorify violence, but to remind the world that Iran’s true legacy is disciplined strength and principled resistance.

  • Foreign detractors and domestic distorters, who posture with human rights rhetoric or geopolitical outrage, find their claims hollow when confronted with a lineage that predates their empires and outclasses their moral theater.

  • The Pan-Iranist tongue is not dipped in vengeance but in historical clarity—a force that unmasks the performative outrage of foreign powers and the clerical distortion of domestic truth.